←back to thread

308 points cjr | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
fsckboy ◴[] No.44537714[source]
it makes sense to me that the pilot who said "I did not do it" actually did do it without realizing it, was supposed to be putting the landing gear up when he committed a muscle memory mistake. it happened around the time the landing gear should be up, and this explanation matches what was said in the cockpit, and the fact that the landing gear wasn't retracted. I think this idea was even floated initially by the youtube pilot/analysts I watch but dismissed as unlikely.
replies(9): >>44537808 #>>44538063 #>>44538104 #>>44538161 #>>44538361 #>>44540315 #>>44541363 #>>44541712 #>>44541805 #
zamadatix ◴[] No.44538104[source]
One of the nice things about finally having the preliminary report is I get to stop hearing all of the same assumptions/theories/YouTuber said/"a guy I know got a leaked report"/etc in water cooler talk at work because the preliminary report solidly disproved all of them so far. If anyone even had and stuck with an idea matching this report it wouldn't have stood out in the conversations anyways.

The collection of comments on this post remind me it'll just be a brand new set of random guesses until the final report is released. Or worse - the final report reaches no further conclusions and it just has to fade out of interest naturally over time.

replies(1): >>44539933 #
1. swores ◴[] No.44539933[source]
It's human nature to want to guess at possible explanations for things that are unusual and unexpected.

If hearing those guesses annoys you, nobody is forcing you to read through comments on a thread of people making them! (I hope - sorry if you are being forced after all.)