←back to thread

299 points cjr | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.562s | source
1. jeswin ◴[] No.44539038[source]
The switch had to be operated deliberately, but still a UX fail on a modern aircraft if cutting off fuel to the engines does not result in an audible alert/alarm which both pilots can hear - especially at that altitude.
replies(2): >>44540525 #>>44541979 #
2. testrun ◴[] No.44540525[source]
It would not make any difference. They were too low and did not have enough time to recover. They immediately switched back to on. Two captains is discussing it here (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SE0BetkXsLg).
3. shawabawa3 ◴[] No.44541979[source]
Are you sure there wasn't an audible alarm?

The switches were re-engaged within 10 seconds so isn't it possible they quickly heard a warning alarm, realised the issue and fixed it? (Of course, not quick enough in this case)