←back to thread

628 points xbryanx | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
mike_hearn ◴[] No.44531351[source]
To the NY Times: please don't say they died by suicide. The passive voice makes it sound like some act of God, something regrettable but unavoidable that just somehow happened. It's important not to sugarcoat what happened: the postmasters killed themselves because the British state was imprisoning them for crimes they didn't commit, based on evidence from a buggy financial accounting system. Don't blur the details of what happened by making it sound like a natural disaster.

Horizon is the case that should replace Therac-25 as a study in what can go wrong if software developers screw up. Therac-25 injured/killed six people, Horizon has ruined hundreds of lives and ended dozens. And the horrifying thing is, Horizon wasn't something anyone would have previously identified as safety-critical software. It was just an ordinary point-of-sale and accounting system. The suicides weren't directly caused by the software, but from an out of control justice and social system in which people blindly believed in public institutions that were actually engaged in a massive deep state cover-up.

It is reasonable to blame the suicides on the legal and political system that allowed the Post Office to act in that way, and which put such low quality people in charge. Perhaps also on the software engineer who testified repeatedly under oath that the system worked fine, even as the bug tracker filled up with cases where it didn't. But this is HN, so from a software engineering perspective what can be learned?

Some glitches were of their time and wouldn't occur these days, e.g. malfunctions in resistive touch screens that caused random clicks on POS screens to occur overnight. But most were bugs due to loss of transactionality or lack of proper auditing controls. Think message replays lacking proper idempotency, things like that. Transactions were logged that never really occurred, and when the cash was counted some appeared to be missing, so the Post Office accused the postmasters of stealing from the business. They hadn't done so, but this took place over decades, and decades ago people had more faith in institutions than they do now. And these post offices were often in small villages where the post office was the center of the community, so the false allegations against postmasters were devastating to their social and business lives.

Put simply - check your transactions! And make sure developers can't rewrite databases in prod.

replies(19): >>44531419 #>>44531429 #>>44531441 #>>44531521 #>>44531528 #>>44531663 #>>44531829 #>>44531922 #>>44531950 #>>44531986 #>>44531999 #>>44532057 #>>44532232 #>>44532622 #>>44532757 #>>44532759 #>>44533432 #>>44535081 #>>44538524 #
johnorourke ◴[] No.44531528[source]
"died by suicide" is just a modern replacement for "committed suicide", because that phrase dates back to when it was a crime, so it's regarded as making the victim look bad.
replies(4): >>44531586 #>>44531591 #>>44531641 #>>44531844 #
tjwebbnorfolk ◴[] No.44531591[source]
I say this as someone whose father killed himself when I was in 5th grade:

The "victims" who suffer after a suicide are the living, not the dead. These kinds of "modernizations" are transparent PC nonsense made up by well-intentioned do-gooders who have no idea how to represent the interests of other people who have a lived experience that they don't understand.

The person is dead either way. There's literally no way to sugarcoat this fact. We'd rather you just speak in plain, honest language than trying to make it sound less bad somehow.

replies(2): >>44531653 #>>44531683 #
CrazyStat ◴[] No.44531683[source]
What makes “committed suicide” any more plain or honest than “died by suicide”?
replies(4): >>44531754 #>>44531779 #>>44531820 #>>44534372 #
reliabilityguy ◴[] No.44531779[source]
Because the latter implies some external attribute to it?
replies(1): >>44533882 #
wat10000 ◴[] No.44533882[source]
That's what makes the latter more accurate.
replies(1): >>44538584 #
reliabilityguy ◴[] No.44538584[source]
How come?
replies(1): >>44538875 #
1. wat10000 ◴[] No.44538875{3}[source]
Because there often is an external attribute, especially if you consider illness to be “external” as is conventional for most deaths caused by illness.