←back to thread

766 points rcchen | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.249s | source
Show context
dalemhurley ◴[] No.44537376[source]
Cursor (and Garry Tan’s X post) has shown us that the VC money is propping up these companies astounding growth, the only way for them to become profitable is to increase the cost per a request, which means they need to innovate like crazy.

The moat is paper thin.

GitHub has open sourced copilot.

The open source community is working hard on their own projects.

No doubt Cursor is moving fast to create amazing innovations, but if the competition only focuses on thin wrappers they are not worth the billion dollar valuations.

I love watching this space as it is moving extremely fast.

replies(6): >>44537680 #>>44537693 #>>44537910 #>>44537998 #>>44538331 #>>44540883 #
TechDebtDevin ◴[] No.44537998[source]
Cursor just committed mass consumer fraud at worst, and at best pissed off all their best customers. I feel really sorry for those who invested at a 9bb valuation.
replies(2): >>44538067 #>>44538127 #
aeve890 ◴[] No.44538127[source]
>Cursor just committed mass consumer fraud at worst, and at best pissed off all their best customers.

What happened?

replies(1): >>44538243 #
wadefletch ◴[] No.44538243[source]
flip-flopping on pricing has led users to feel nickel-and-dimed

i like cursor fine, but check out the forum/subreddit to see people talking like addicts, pissed their fix is getting more expensive

i think this aggressive reaction is more pronounced for non-programmers who are making things for the first time. they tasted a new power and they don't want it taken away.

replies(4): >>44538759 #>>44538874 #>>44539842 #>>44540420 #
1. bn-l ◴[] No.44538759[source]
No I’m a programmer and I’m better about the rug pull also.