←back to thread

239 points sandslash | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.323s | source
Show context
w10-1 ◴[] No.44535288[source]
Not sure why this has drawn silence and attacks - whence the animus to Ng? His high-level assessments seem accurate, he's a reasonable champion of AI, and he speaks credibly based on advising many companies. What am I missing? (He does fall on the side of open models (as input factors): is that the threat?)

He argues that landscape is changing (at least quarterly), and that services are (best) replaceable (often week-to-week) because models change, but that orchestration is harder to replace, and that there are relatively few orchestration platforms.

So: what platforms are available? Are there other HN posts that assess the current state of AI orchestration?

(What's the AI-orchestration acronym? not PAAS but AIOPAAS? AOP? (since aspect-oriented programming is history))

replies(8): >>44535527 #>>44535549 #>>44535569 #>>44535659 #>>44536132 #>>44537996 #>>44539312 #>>44539997 #
jart ◴[] No.44536132[source]
I like Andrew Ng. He's like the Mister Rogers of AI. I always listen when he has something to say.
replies(2): >>44536212 #>>44536408 #
1. mnky9800n ◴[] No.44536408[source]
And he’s been doing it forever and all from the original idea that he could offer a Stanford education on ai for free on the Internet thus he created coursera. The dude is cool.