←back to thread

351 points perihelions | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
prairieroadent ◴[] No.44534531[source]
there has to be a way for us as a society to introduce a level of accountability into our so called "food" supply chain without the burden of regulation... perhaps it's as simple as spending more educating our kids about agriculture

amendment: seems to be an unpopular take... my point being regulation is a workaround for a population that is worst than uneducated, miseducated, especially in regards to agriculture and "food" supply chain... if kids were provided with an actual education and not miseducated on the subject then the demand for on-demand food testing would go up, and prices for said testing would eventually go down after supply rises to meet demand increasing competition thus encouraging technological innovations to come in and lower prices

amendment ii: in a competitive market where all participants are thoroughly educated and the consumer is armed with the ability to test their food frequently then a market would likely emerge where consumers buy directly from farmers who out of market forces publish test alongside their crop

replies(4): >>44534570 #>>44534752 #>>44534869 #>>44535107 #
padjo ◴[] No.44535107[source]
So rather than have government do the testing and holding producers to account we get every consumer to do it? That sounds pretty inefficient.
replies(1): >>44535457 #
prairieroadent ◴[] No.44535457[source]
I imagine that in a competitive market where the participants are educated that the farmers would publish tests alongside their crop and the educated consumer would understand that they should be buying direct from farmers and be processing the turmeric themselves
replies(3): >>44536139 #>>44536220 #>>44537359 #
1. padjo ◴[] No.44536220[source]
Great, and how do we know the test results they publish are accurate?