←back to thread

242 points sandslash | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.45s | source
Show context
w10-1 ◴[] No.44535288[source]
Not sure why this has drawn silence and attacks - whence the animus to Ng? His high-level assessments seem accurate, he's a reasonable champion of AI, and he speaks credibly based on advising many companies. What am I missing? (He does fall on the side of open models (as input factors): is that the threat?)

He argues that landscape is changing (at least quarterly), and that services are (best) replaceable (often week-to-week) because models change, but that orchestration is harder to replace, and that there are relatively few orchestration platforms.

So: what platforms are available? Are there other HN posts that assess the current state of AI orchestration?

(What's the AI-orchestration acronym? not PAAS but AIOPAAS? AOP? (since aspect-oriented programming is history))

replies(8): >>44535527 #>>44535549 #>>44535569 #>>44535659 #>>44536132 #>>44537996 #>>44539312 #>>44539997 #
lubujackson ◴[] No.44535659[source]
I'm guessing because this is basically an AI for Dummies overview, while half of HN is deep in the weeds with AI already. Nothing wrong with the talk! Except his focus on "do everything" agents already feels a bit stale as the move seems to be going in the direction of limited agents with a much stronger focus on orchestration of tools and context.
replies(3): >>44535930 #>>44536245 #>>44541603 #
1. hakanderyal ◴[] No.44535930[source]
From the recent threads, it feels like the other half is totally, willfully ignorant. Hence the responses.
replies(1): >>44541606 #
2. rhizome31 ◴[] No.44541606[source]
As someone who is part of that other half, I agree.