←back to thread

624 points xbryanx | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.231s | source
Show context
throw0101c ◴[] No.44531395[source]
The four-part mini-series Mr Bates vs The Post Office is worth checking out:

> A faulty IT system called Horizon, developed by Fujitsu, creates apparent cash shortfalls that cause Post Office Limited to pursue prosecutions for fraud, theft and false accounting against a number of subpostmasters across the UK. In 2009, a group of these, led by Alan Bates, forms the Justice for Subpostmasters Alliance. The prosecutions and convictions are later ruled a miscarriage of justice at the conclusion of the Bates & Others v Post Office Ltd judicial case in 2019.[4][5]

* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mr_Bates_vs_The_Post_Office

replies(2): >>44531580 #>>44531937 #
ThisNameIsTaken ◴[] No.44531580[source]
What is particularly striking about the scandal is the impact of the mini-series. From what I understand (as a foreigner to the UK) is that it was the mini-series that sparked national interest in the case. Without it, those involved would still be in a bureaucratic and legal nightmare, in which all institutions rejected their innocence claims, and hardly anyone would have been held accountable. See also the "Impact" section on the linked wiki page.

It leaves me wondering how the situation would have been if it would have been a (dramaturgically) 'bad' series. It might have left those involved even worse of.

replies(6): >>44532022 #>>44532063 #>>44532687 #>>44533074 #>>44533096 #>>44534714 #
1. PaulKeeble ◴[] No.44532063[source]
The people are still waiting for their money back and their names to be cleared. The scandal continues.

I first saw news about this scandal and the early evidence of wrong doing by the Post Office in 2008.