←back to thread

724 points simonw | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.682s | source
Show context
0points ◴[] No.44529722[source]
> Israel ranks high on democracy indicies

Those rankings must be rigged.

Nethanyahu should be locked up in jail now for the corruption charges he was facing before the Hamas attack.

He literally stopped elections in Israel since then and there's been protests against his government daily for some years now.

And now, even taco tries to have the corruption charges dropped for Nethanyahu, then you must know he's guilty.

https://nypost.com/2025/06/29/world-news/israeli-court-postp...

https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/netanyahu-corrupti...

replies(3): >>44529811 #>>44529954 #>>44530188 #
Asafp ◴[] No.44529811[source]
Almost none of what you wrote above is true, no idea how is this a top comment. Israel is a democracy. Netanyahu's trail is still ongoing, the war did not stop the trails and until he is proven guilty (and if) he should not go to jail. He did not stop any elections, Israel have elections every 4 years, it still did not pass 4 years since last elections. Israel is not perfect, but it is a democracy. Source: Lives in Israel.
replies(4): >>44529850 #>>44530008 #>>44530351 #>>44530493 #
DiogenesKynikos ◴[] No.44530008[source]
Israel is a democracy (albeit increasingly authoritarian) only if you belong to one ethnicity. There are 5 million Palestinians living under permanent Israeli rule who have no rights at all. No citizenship. No civil rights. Not even the most basic human rights. They can be imprisoned indefinitely without charges. They can be shot, and nothing will happen. This has been the situation for nearly 60 years now. No other country like this would be called a democracy.
replies(4): >>44530079 #>>44530190 #>>44530481 #>>44530584 #
thyristan ◴[] No.44530079[source]
Afaik those 5 million Palestinians are not Israeli citizens because they don't want to be, and rather would have their refugee and Palestinian citizen status. There are also Palestinians who have chosen to be Israeli citizens, with the usual democratic rights and representation, with their own people in the Knesset, etc.

And shooting enemies in a war is unfortunately not something you would investigate, it isn't even murder, it is just a consequence of war under the articles of war. In cases where civilians are shot (what Israel defines to be civilians), there are investigations and sometimes even punishments for the perpetrators. Now you may (sometimes rightfully) claim that those investigations and punishments are too few, one-sided and not done by a neutral party. But those do happen, which by far isn't "nothing".

replies(3): >>44530182 #>>44530236 #>>44530290 #
DiogenesKynikos[dead post] ◴[] No.44530182[source]
[flagged]
reliabilityguy ◴[] No.44530616[source]
> who were not expelled by Israel in 1948

A large fraction of “expelled” Palestinians were “expelled” because Arab armies told them to leave for the time of fighting. For some reason you ignore this fact and put it all on Israel “expelling” people.

replies(1): >>44531123 #
DiogenesKynikos ◴[] No.44531123[source]
That's not true. It's a nationalist myth in Israel that was thoroughly debunked by none other than Israeli historians 40 years ago.

Palestinians overwhelmingly fled because:

* They were forced to at gunpoint by Zionist/Israeli forces, as at Ramle, Lod and many other places.

* Their towns came under direct attack by Zionist forces, as at Haifa and many other places.

* They feared for their lives, especially after Zionist massacres of Arab civilians at places like Deir Yassin became known.

This has been documented in great detail by Israeli historians for each Palestinian town.

For example, much of the population of Gaza comes from Palestinian towns that used to exist in what is now southern Israel. They were driven out and their towns were largely razed by Zionist forces in Operation Barak. Zionist forces had explicit orders to clear out the Arab population, which is what they did with extreme ruthlessness (including atrocities that are too horrible to describe on HN, but which you can read about in histories of the operation).

replies(1): >>44531361 #
reliabilityguy ◴[] No.44531361[source]
Well, Google says otherwise, eg with Haifa. So, it is not a clear cut. Saying that it was all evil zionists is history revisionism.

Moreover, the Arab-Israeli war was full of expulsions from both sides. My original point still stands.

replies(1): >>44531680 #
DiogenesKynikos ◴[] No.44531680[source]
Haifa is a cut-and-dry case. There was a massive attack by Zionist paramilitaries on the Arab neighborhoods of Haifa in April 1948, which ended with almost the entire Arab population fleeing.

1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Haifa_(1948)

replies(1): >>44531877 #
1. reliabilityguy ◴[] No.44531877[source]
I’m sorry, but Wikipedia is not a trusted source, especially after October 7th it’s just filled with propaganda.

Here: https://www.camera.org/article/contradicting-its-own-archive...

Paints completely different picture based on the NYT reporting of the time. So, as I said: my point still stands.

replies(1): >>44538720 #
2. DiogenesKynikos ◴[] No.44538720[source]
You complain about bias, but then cite a website that is quite explicitly an Israeli propaganda operation.

Are you denying that the Haganah launched a massive attack on the Arab neighborhoods of Haifa in April 1948, driving the population to flight? That's just a plain historical fact. Denying that is like saying the US Civil War didn't happen.

replies(1): >>44550930 #
3. reliabilityguy ◴[] No.44550930[source]
> but then cite a website that is quite explicitly an Israeli propaganda operation.

You mean the NYT reporting of a time is an Israeli propaganda? Can you prove that or you simply dismiss this evidence because it doesn’t suit your narrative?