←back to thread

171 points vercantez | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.235s | source
Show context
codeulike ◴[] No.44525977[source]
MS Sql Server not even mentioned. This tells us there is a whole world almost totally omitted from discussion on HN: "Enterprise"
replies(3): >>44526002 #>>44526160 #>>44529909 #
thewebguyd ◴[] No.44526160[source]
Oracle isn't in there either, which goes to show how much of a bubble HN actually is considering MSSQL and Oracle are #1 and #2 in market share.
replies(5): >>44526709 #>>44529046 #>>44529466 #>>44529705 #>>44529901 #
morkalork ◴[] No.44526709[source]
I used MS SQL and Oracle at my last job, but what's there to say about them? They've been around forever, are stable and get all the same table-stakes feature updates as everyone else. Start-ups avoid them like the plague because they're so damn expensive, you won't be running either on your phone or an embedded device like SQLite either.
replies(2): >>44528013 #>>44531390 #
1. llm_nerd ◴[] No.44531390[source]
>Start-ups avoid them like the plague because they're so damn expensive

While in a way it's just a corollary on the expensive bit, the license compliance of the same becomes such a monumental hassle as well, and is just an enormous time waste for everyone involved. For everything you want to do there's a probing Microsoft or Oracle salesperson trying to shake you down a little harder.

Go with Postgres et al and you can be geographically distributing, horizontally and vertically scaling in a million ways, making whatever warm of cold standby or recovery system you want, and so on. Even when the pricing of the enterprise offerings were tolerable, the system around constantly extracting a pound of flesh is so overbearing it induces opposition.