←back to thread

Red Hat Technical Writing Style Guide

(stylepedia.net)
265 points jumpocelot | 1 comments | 10 Jul 25 15:01 UTC | HN request time: 0.206s | source
Show context
GLdRH ◴[10 Jul 25 19:09 UTC] No.44524415[source]▶
Section 4.6 is certainly ridiculous, but I suppose you can just ignore it.
replies(3): >>44524795 #>>44524819 #>>44531156 #
1. Cthulhu_ ◴[11 Jul 25 12:01 UTC] No.44531156[source]▶
It seems you have a certain hyperfocus on inclusivity being mentioned, which is a shame; did you engage with the rest of the document with as much effort? Or do you have an agenda and/or an irrational emotional response to mentions of inclusivity?