←back to thread

688 points dheerajvs | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
groos ◴[] No.44524101[source]
One thing I've experienced in trying to use LLMs to code in an existing large code base is that it's _extremely_ hard to accurately describe what you want to do. Oftentimes, you are working on a problem with a web of interactions all over the code and describing the problem to an LLM will take far longer than just doing it manually. This is not the case with generating new (boilerplate) code for projects, which is where users report the most favorable interaction with LLMs.
replies(2): >>44524392 #>>44527892 #
1. phyzome ◴[] No.44527892[source]
Hell, a lot of times I can't even explain an idea to my coworkers in a conversation, and I eventually say "I'll just explain it in code instead of words." And I just quickly put up a small PR that makes the skeleton of the changes (or even the entire changeset) and then we continue our conversation (or just do the review).