←back to thread

688 points dheerajvs | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.24s | source
Show context
noisy_boy ◴[] No.44523098[source]
It is 80/20 again - it gets you 80% of the way in 20% of the time and then you spend 80% of the time to get the rest of the 20% done. And since it always feels like it is almost there, sunk-cost fallacy comes into play as well and you just don't want to give up.

I think an approach that I tried recently is to use it as a friction remover instead of a solution provider. I do the programming but use it to remove pebbles such as that small bit of syntax I forgot, basically to keep up the velocity. However, I don't look at the wholesale code it offers. I think keeping the active thinking cap on results in code I actually understand while avoiding skill atrophy.

replies(9): >>44523200 #>>44523227 #>>44523342 #>>44523381 #>>44523532 #>>44523832 #>>44525241 #>>44528585 #>>44532723 #
emodendroket ◴[] No.44523227[source]
I think it’s most useful when you basically need Stack Overflow on steroids: I basically know what I want to do but I’m not sure how to achieve it using this environment. It can also be helpful for debugging and rubber ducking generally.
replies(4): >>44523343 #>>44523436 #>>44523560 #>>44523787 #
some-guy ◴[] No.44523436[source]
All those things are true, but it's such a small part of my workflow at this point that the savings, while nice, aren't nearly as life-changing to my job as my CEO is forcing us to think it is.

Once AI can actually untangle our 14 year old codebase full of hosh-posh code, read every commit message, JIRA ticket, and Slack conversation related to the changes in full context, it's not going to solve a lot of the hard problems at my job.

replies(1): >>44527088 #
1. emodendroket ◴[] No.44527088[source]
Some of the “explain what it does” functionality is better than you might think but to be honest I find myself called on to work with unfamiliar tools all the time so I find plenty of value.