←back to thread

173 points jumpocelot | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
perching_aix ◴[] No.44524926[source]
Might be just my ESL self being silly but these examples both read horribly:

> For example, the sentence, "The Developer Center, a site for reference material and other resources, has been introduced to the OpenShift website." reads better than

Even without reading the next bit I just knew that no, this does not read better. The insertion of "a site for reference material and other resources" just makes this sentence horrible to follow period.

> "The OpenShift website introduces the Developer Center, a site for reference material and other resources." Here, the passive voice is better because the important issue ("The Developer Center") is the subject of the sentence.

This reads silly for another reason: websites don't... introduce things. Website owners might. Also, I feel it should say "reference materials" not "reference material".

replies(3): >>44525075 #>>44526287 #>>44527749 #
1. BalinKing ◴[] No.44525075[source]
It might be dialectical, but in American English, I think “reference material” sounds fine. (Maybe “material” in this context is uncountable or collective or something)