←back to thread

688 points dheerajvs | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.249s | source
Show context
noisy_boy ◴[] No.44523098[source]
It is 80/20 again - it gets you 80% of the way in 20% of the time and then you spend 80% of the time to get the rest of the 20% done. And since it always feels like it is almost there, sunk-cost fallacy comes into play as well and you just don't want to give up.

I think an approach that I tried recently is to use it as a friction remover instead of a solution provider. I do the programming but use it to remove pebbles such as that small bit of syntax I forgot, basically to keep up the velocity. However, I don't look at the wholesale code it offers. I think keeping the active thinking cap on results in code I actually understand while avoiding skill atrophy.

replies(9): >>44523200 #>>44523227 #>>44523342 #>>44523381 #>>44523532 #>>44523832 #>>44525241 #>>44528585 #>>44532723 #
wmeredith ◴[] No.44523200[source]
> and then you spend 80% of the time to get the rest of the 20% done

This was my pr-AI experience anyway, so getting that first chunk of time back is helpful.

Related: One of the better takes I've seen on AI from an experienced developer was, "90% of my skills just became worthless, and the other 10% just became 1,000 times more valuable." There's some hyperbole there, I but I like the gist.

replies(2): >>44523577 #>>44524554 #
1. skydhash ◴[] No.44523577[source]
It’s not funny when you find yourself redoing the first 80%, as the only way to complete the second 80%.