←back to thread

353 points dmazin | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
rel_ic ◴[] No.44520938[source]
Renewable energy is great, but we're not replacing fossil fuels with it, we're just adding more energy usage. And our energy usage is destroying the environment.

Don't let these advancements in solar make you think things are getting better. We need to reduce fossil fuel usage, not just increase solar usage.

https://pocketcasts.com/podcasts/b3b696c0-226d-0137-f265-1d2...

replies(9): >>44521010 #>>44521628 #>>44521789 #>>44521802 #>>44521954 #>>44522009 #>>44522223 #>>44523270 #>>44524628 #
amarait ◴[] No.44521010[source]
What replaces fossil fuels is some kind of breakthrough in batteries. At the moment its getting better every year were currently at less than $100 per KWh which is crazy but needs to be improved for allowing more off the grid energy consumption
replies(8): >>44521191 #>>44521234 #>>44521257 #>>44521565 #>>44521793 #>>44521920 #>>44521958 #>>44522105 #
pydry ◴[] No.44521234[source]
We can either pray and wait for a technological breakthrough that makes storage tech way cheaper than gas or we can just use taxes and subsidies to make it happen now.

It's not so hard. Lavish subsidies were used to make nuclear power semi-sort-of-competitive even though it's way more expensive.

The same thing could have been done with solar and wind but apparently we thought the best course of action was just to wait until they became cheaper than coal without subsidies (& then Obama and Trump slammed solar with tariffs).

replies(2): >>44521312 #>>44521513 #
fastball ◴[] No.44521513[source]
Or we can go full nuclear.
replies(3): >>44521913 #>>44521933 #>>44524721 #
1. pydry ◴[] No.44521913{4}[source]
could do but im not sure what there is to be gained from unnecessarily spending trillions more to decarbonize.