←back to thread

539 points donohoe | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
mihaic ◴[] No.44518079[source]
Tangential, I still find it absurd people accept calling it X instead of Twitter. While I'd generally agree that most companies can change their name, encroaching on a basic letter should be off limits, like naming your company "The" or "God".

Still sticking with Twitter until a reasonable name is found, which by Musk is never.

replies(12): >>44518181 #>>44518313 #>>44518349 #>>44518396 #>>44518426 #>>44518484 #>>44518779 #>>44518800 #>>44518843 #>>44518857 #>>44519013 #>>44519082 #
azangru ◴[] No.44518181[source]
> While I'd generally agree that most companies can change their name, encroaching on a basic letter should be off limits

To me it's the other way around. If the platform had been named X from the start, then a language would have developed around it, including what its messages are called, or what verb is used to refer to posting a message. We, the public, wouldn't have known any better. With Twitter, we do know better — better name, better nouns, better verbs (even a better logo; but that's by the by). Bosses can rename their products as much as they like; it's just surprising to me that we as a public so obligingly give up this tiny bit of our language.

> like naming your company "The" or "God".

Consider truth social :-) I am amazed people agree to call the messages there 'truths', and reposts, 'retruths'. So embarrassing.

replies(3): >>44518348 #>>44518439 #>>44518580 #
1. account42 ◴[] No.44518580[source]
"Tweets" was already an embarrassing term. We used to be fine with just "posts" or "comments" instead of trying to put the company branding in every term.