(www.nytimes.com)

539 points donohoe | 4 comments | 09 Jul 25 14:52 UTC | HN request time: 0.652s | source

Show context

Hoasi ◴[09 Jul 25 15:21 UTC] No.44511157[source]▶

X has been nothing short of an exercise in brand destruction. However, despite all the drama, it still stands, it still exists, and it remains relevant.

replies(23): >>44511323 #>>44511451 #>>44511453 #>>44511457 #>>44511712 #>>44512087 #>>44512184 #>>44512275 #>>44512704 #>>44513825 #>>44513960 #>>44514302 #>>44514688 #>>44516258 #>>44517308 #>>44517368 #>>44517871 #>>44517980 #>>44519236 #>>44519282 #>>44520336 #>>44520826 #>>44522391 #

1. paride5745 ◴[10 Jul 25 06:37 UTC] No.44517980[source]▶

>>44511157 #

Let's be honest, there is no real alternative.

replies(2): >>44519210 #>>44519729 #

2. spacechild1 ◴[10 Jul 25 09:53 UTC] No.44519210[source]▶

>>44517980 (TP) #

What's wrong with Bluesky?

replies(1): >>44527042 #

3. codingdave ◴[10 Jul 25 11:19 UTC] No.44519729[source]▶

>>44517980 (TP) #

"Not using it." is a completely acceptable alternative. It does not actually solve a problem in one's life.

4. jacooper ◴[11 Jul 25 00:01 UTC] No.44527042[source]▶

>>44519210 #

It's irrelevant, no body uses it

↑

Linda Yaccarino is leaving X