←back to thread

US Court nullifies FTC requirement for click-to-cancel

(arstechnica.com)
575 points gausswho | 1 comments | 08 Jul 25 22:42 UTC | HN request time: 0.226s | source
Show context
John23832 ◴[09 Jul 25 13:14 UTC] No.44509670[source]▶
What consumer does this serve at all? What citizen does this serve at all?

This only serves to allow firms to erect effort barriers to keep rent seeking fro their customers. The "gotcha" that the Khan FTC didn't "follow the rules making process" is parallel construction.

replies(10): >>44509742 #>>44509759 #>>44510095 #>>44510337 #>>44510719 #>>44510834 #>>44511178 #>>44511684 #>>44511936 #>>44516884 #
1. mbac32768 ◴[10 Jul 25 03:25 UTC] No.44516884[source]▶
If there are at least 10,000 subscription services in the US and they will spend at least $10,000 to figure out if and how to comply with a click to cancel requirement (feel free to move zeros from one number to the other), the law says they must be allowed to at least have their comments heard before it's implemented. This comment opportunity was not provided.

The regulator said it didn't reach $100 million, so there was no need. The court said bs, this would cost at least that much