←back to thread

US Court nullifies FTC requirement for click-to-cancel

(arstechnica.com)
575 points gausswho | 1 comments | 08 Jul 25 22:42 UTC | HN request time: 0.218s | source
Show context
John23832 ◴[09 Jul 25 13:14 UTC] No.44509670[source]▶
What consumer does this serve at all? What citizen does this serve at all?

This only serves to allow firms to erect effort barriers to keep rent seeking fro their customers. The "gotcha" that the Khan FTC didn't "follow the rules making process" is parallel construction.

replies(10): >>44509742 #>>44509759 #>>44510095 #>>44510337 #>>44510719 #>>44510834 #>>44511178 #>>44511684 #>>44511936 #>>44516884 #
derektank ◴[09 Jul 25 16:02 UTC] No.44511684[source]▶
People are served by knowing that, regardless of what the law says, it will be applied consistently. It's on the legislature to write new law if the old law is bad, not the judiciary.
replies(3): >>44512109 #>>44512554 #>>44514127 #
1. jfengel ◴[09 Jul 25 17:15 UTC] No.44512554[source]▶
That would ring less hollow if there were any way for the legislature to actually write laws. Congress writes vanishingly little non-trivial legislation, because every proposal has to be viewed in terms of political benefit.

I don't think people feel well served by knowing that bad laws will last forever. The civil service was supposed to be a non-partisan way to manage the country efficiently. It does not do me any good to say "No, you are stuck with the inefficient system, and you should feel good about that because at least it's written down."