←back to thread

236 points l8rlump | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.21s | source
Show context
strogonoff ◴[] No.44506692[source]
The best raw image processing tool I know is called “RawTherapee”. It was developed by one or more absolute colour science geeks, it is CLI-scriptable, its companion RawPedia is a treasure trove of information (I learned many basics there, including how to create DCP profiles for calibration, dark frames, flat fields, etc.), and not to make a dig (fine, to make a bit of a dig) you can see the expertise starting with how it capitalizes “raw” in its name (which is, of course, not at all an acronym, though like with “WASM” it is a common mistake).

Beware though that it tends to not abstract away a lot of technicalities, if you dig deep enough you may encounter exotic terms like “illuminant”, “demosaicing method”, “green equilibration”, “CAM16”, “PU”, “nit” and so on, but I personally love it for that even while I am still learning what half of it all means.

I’d say the only major lacking feature of RT is support for HDR output, which hopefully will be coming by way of PNG v3 and Rec. 2100 support.

replies(6): >>44506737 #>>44506783 #>>44507092 #>>44508512 #>>44511100 #>>44511450 #
babuloseo ◴[] No.44506783[source]
I like this one its simple and easy to use
replies(1): >>44507013 #
strogonoff ◴[] No.44507013[source]
May I ask why choose to shoot raw given simplicity and ease of use are priorities?
replies(3): >>44507116 #>>44507120 #>>44507727 #
Mashimo ◴[] No.44507727[source]
I have the same approach. I really like "easy to use, hard to master" tools in general.

If you look at CaptureOne you can see how easy it is to edit a raw image. Most of the time it looks like the camera jpeg without having to tune anything. But then you have the options to go in depth.

Sometimes I have a photo session where everything is to my liking, just a bit of exposure and crop. Other times I shoot in night clubs with no flash and I have multiple layers of masks for a single photo.

A UI with decent defaults goes a long way into making a complex app easy to use.

replies(1): >>44508097 #
strogonoff ◴[] No.44508097[source]
This tracks with my RawTherapee experience. I copy in base settings corresponding to the camera and the lens and then make tweaks. After a while often one of the pre-made profiles is good enough.
replies(1): >>44512095 #
1. igouy ◴[] No.44512095[source]
For example — Adobe\CameraRaw Sony SLT-A65 Adobe Standard.dcp ?

    DCP Tone curve
    DCP Base table
    DCP Look table