←back to thread

353 points dmazin | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.906s | source
Show context
arh5451 ◴[] No.44509839[source]
Nice article explaining solar energy policy. I think the article still doesn't address the mismatch between solar energy production and consumption, which needs to be filled by storage mechanisms. Also would have been nice to have a critical look at how the Chinese were able to corner the Solar market via state sponsored means.
replies(11): >>44509893 #>>44509931 #>>44509934 #>>44509952 #>>44510015 #>>44510221 #>>44510461 #>>44512036 #>>44517244 #>>44518128 #>>44518506 #
1. georgemcbay ◴[] No.44512036[source]
> Also would have been nice to have a critical look at how the Chinese were able to corner the Solar market via state sponsored means.

What if... (stick with me here because this is about to get crazy)... free market capitalism isn't the best solution for everything...?

replies(1): >>44519160 #
2. throwaway2037 ◴[] No.44519160[source]
The correct solution is to make China pay tariffs in proportion to their explicit and implicit state support for their "private" industries. It is not too late to push back.
replies(1): >>44522747 #
3. olddustytrail ◴[] No.44522747[source]
You can't make China pay tariffs because it's not the exporter that pays them, it's the importer.

Tariffs in the USA are basically a tax on Americans. The aim being to make imported goods more expensive for Americans so they're more likely to buy local goods which would otherwise be more expensive than the imported version.