←back to thread

Linda Yaccarino is leaving X

(www.nytimes.com)
543 points donohoe | 1 comments | 09 Jul 25 14:52 UTC | HN request time: 0.206s | source
Show context
jeffbee ◴[09 Jul 25 15:09 UTC] No.44510975[source]▶
Have any of the people who noisily joined X to make a big impact fast actually had a big impact over any time frame? Remember when G. Hotz said he was going to fix Twitter search in 6 weeks, and then it turned out that G. Hotz is just another midwit like anyone else and Twitter search is still as bad as ever? Yaccarino said they were going to transform Twitter into the "everything app" with payments, marketplaces, and even banking. None of which it turns out was within the abilities of Linda Yaccarino.
replies(6): >>44511404 #>>44511511 #>>44511521 #>>44511529 #>>44511569 #>>44516934 #
delusional ◴[09 Jul 25 15:51 UTC] No.44511569[source]▶
> turned out that G. Hotz is just another midwit like anyone else

I understand your point, but I think this sort of discourse leads people down the wrong path. G. Hotz is a pretty smart engineer. What he lacks at twitter is probably not engineering ability, but organization ability. The problem is likely not that the individual engineers aren't smart, it's that they end up working together to make each other worse than they could be.

replies(2): >>44511752 #>>44512215 #
1. hocuspocus ◴[09 Jul 25 16:09 UTC] No.44511752[source]▶
After Elon fired 80% of the staff, I think we can assume that most of the organizational hurdles were effectively gone, and that it was the perfect time for a cowboy developer to jump in and fix something that would have been stopped by conservative approaches and team work before.

If search could have been solved by a single smart person, it would have been done long ago. In the Bay Area, finding a world class researcher (in distributed systems, databases, text search or whatnot) able to do a short stint at a company to tackle a hard problem isn't particularly hard.