(arstechnica.com)

587 points gausswho | 1 comments | 08 Jul 25 22:42 UTC | HN request time: 0.209s | source

Show context

John23832 ◴[09 Jul 25 13:14 UTC] No.44509670[source]▶

What consumer does this serve at all? What citizen does this serve at all?

This only serves to allow firms to erect effort barriers to keep rent seeking fro their customers. The "gotcha" that the Khan FTC didn't "follow the rules making process" is parallel construction.

replies(10): >>44509742 #>>44509759 #>>44510095 #>>44510337 #>>44510719 #>>44510834 #>>44511178 #>>44511684 #>>44511936 #>>44516884 #

1. NickC25 ◴[09 Jul 25 15:22 UTC] No.44511178[source]▶

>>44509670 #

This benefits the lawmaker's clients - the large corporations. Or maybe the lawmakers are the clients.

Either way this ruling was bought and paid for.

↑

US Court nullifies FTC requirement for click-to-cancel