←back to thread

353 points dmazin | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.212s | source
Show context
arh5451 ◴[] No.44509839[source]
Nice article explaining solar energy policy. I think the article still doesn't address the mismatch between solar energy production and consumption, which needs to be filled by storage mechanisms. Also would have been nice to have a critical look at how the Chinese were able to corner the Solar market via state sponsored means.
replies(11): >>44509893 #>>44509931 #>>44509934 #>>44509952 #>>44510015 #>>44510221 #>>44510461 #>>44512036 #>>44517244 #>>44518128 #>>44518506 #
LetsGetTechnicl ◴[] No.44509934[source]
What "critical look" is there to take? How about the way that the US gov't subsidizes the oil and gas industry, and is about to restart the coal industry? For some reason gov't investment in industry is only bad when China does it.
replies(5): >>44509992 #>>44510154 #>>44510501 #>>44513014 #>>44518453 #
1. mensetmanusman ◴[] No.44510501[source]
The oil industry pays 10s of billions in taxes.

Any disagreement in how much they should be taxed (e.g. 10,20,30,50,90%) can be considered a subsidy.

What people are mostly concerned with is whether a subsidy is distorting via over production. E.g. when China entered the market in solar, most western solar companies following stricter environmental protection requirements went out of business.