←back to thread

353 points dmazin | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
ryukoposting ◴[] No.44509883[source]
> offering a plausible check to not only the climate crisis but to autocracy. Instead of relying on scattered deposits of fossil fuel—the control of which has largely defined geopolitics for more than a century—we are moving rapidly toward a reliance on diffuse but ubiquitous sources of supply.

A lot of this article was clearly written with rose-colored glasses on, but this might be the silliest line of all. The author just finished talking about how a single country makes up the overwhelming share of solar panel and battery production, but hey, look how much more "diffuse and ubiquitous" it is!

replies(4): >>44509894 #>>44509996 #>>44510457 #>>44518231 #
IsTom ◴[] No.44509894[source]
With some investment you can make solar panels locally, you can't produce new oil deposits.
replies(1): >>44510224 #
1. fragmede ◴[] No.44510224[source]
Isn't that what biofuels are?

Sun -> plants (corn) -> liquid that goes in (modified) cars

replies(2): >>44510345 #>>44513332 #
2. IsTom ◴[] No.44510345[source]
EROI for them is really bad.
replies(1): >>44517360 #
3. triceratops ◴[] No.44513332[source]
Sun (+ fertilizers made using petroleum)
4. pfdietz ◴[] No.44517360[source]
And power/area for biofuels is abysmal. Using PV for BEVs instead of ethanol in ICE vehicles would reduce land requirements by a factor of ~100.