←back to thread

128 points ArmageddonIt | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.212s | source
Show context
jampa ◴[] No.44501089[source]
I like Steve's content, but the ending misses the mark.

With the carriage / car situation, individual transportation is their core business, and most companies are not in the field of Artificial Intelligence.

I say this as someone who has worked for 7 years implementing AI research for production, from automated hardware testing to accessibility for nonverbals: I don't think founders need to obsess even more than they do now about implementing AI, especially in the front end.

This AI hype cycle is missing the mark by building ChatGPT-like bots and buttons with sparkles that perform single OpenAI API calls. AI applications are not a new thing, they have always been here, now they are just more accessible.

The best AI applications are beneath the surface to empower users, Jeff Bezos says that (in 2016!)[1]. You don't see AI as a chatbot in Amazon, you see it for "demand forecasting, product search ranking, product and deals recommendations, merchandising placements, fraud detection, translations."

[1]: https://www.aboutamazon.com/news/company-news/2016-letter-to...

replies(10): >>44501192 #>>44501224 #>>44501278 #>>44501389 #>>44501569 #>>44505291 #>>44505340 #>>44505796 #>>44506753 #>>44508378 #
1. scrubs ◴[] No.44508378[source]
There's a qualitative difference between ok transport and better transport vs AI.

If we're going to talk cars, I think what the Japanese did to the big three in the 1980s would have been far more on point.

AI is encumbered by AGI which is further encumbered by the delta between what is claimed possible (around the corner) and what is. That's a whole different ball game with wildly different risk/reward tradeoffs.

Learning about history post buggies didn't do much for me.