←back to thread

US Court nullifies FTC requirement for click-to-cancel

(arstechnica.com)
574 points gausswho | 1 comments | 08 Jul 25 22:42 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
fwlr ◴[09 Jul 25 02:42 UTC] No.44505910[source]▶
The FTC was warned at the time that they were flouting required procedures and that their rule would therefore not survive legal scrutiny. Lo and behold it did not.
replies(3): >>44506022 #>>44507869 #>>44508126 #
dboreham ◴[09 Jul 25 03:07 UTC] No.44506022[source]▶
Because systematic corruption presumably?
replies(3): >>44506139 #>>44506321 #>>44507715 #
jibe ◴[09 Jul 25 03:39 UTC] No.44506139[source]▶
If you are sniffing out corruption, aren’t the ones flouting required procedures likely the corrupt ones?
replies(3): >>44506211 #>>44507990 #>>44508135 #
1. hshdhdhj4444 ◴[09 Jul 25 10:10 UTC] No.44508135{3}[source]▶
Almost never.

Whistleblowers are almost always revealing information that they are legally prevented from revealing, otherwise you wouldn’t need a whistleblower. A simple FOIA request would suffice.