←back to thread

573 points gausswho | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
fwlr ◴[] No.44505910[source]
The FTC was warned at the time that they were flouting required procedures and that their rule would therefore not survive legal scrutiny. Lo and behold it did not.
replies(3): >>44506022 #>>44507869 #>>44508126 #
dboreham ◴[] No.44506022[source]
Because systematic corruption presumably?
replies(3): >>44506139 #>>44506321 #>>44507715 #
jibe ◴[] No.44506139[source]
If you are sniffing out corruption, aren’t the ones flouting required procedures likely the corrupt ones?
replies(3): >>44506211 #>>44507990 #>>44508135 #
Aeolun ◴[] No.44506211[source]
Kinda, but corruption in my favor is unlikely to see me complain about it.
replies(1): >>44508014 #
1. wrasee ◴[] No.44508014[source]
That’s obviously no justification, all corruption is in someone’s favour. Society functions by rules. Break those founding principles and you break everything.