←back to thread

228 points mshockwave | 5 comments | | HN request time: 1.007s | source
Show context
somanyphotons ◴[] No.44502235[source]
Suddenly another company that has (old?) fabs and a cpu design team in-house

This could be interesting to see how much they try to loss-lead to get market share in the low-end

replies(4): >>44502261 #>>44502358 #>>44502670 #>>44503490 #
kragen ◴[] No.44502358[source]
GF's fabs aren't that old. They were neck-and-neck with TSMC until 02018, when they could do 12nm: https://web.archive.org/web/20190107061855/https://www.v3.co...
replies(2): >>44502554 #>>44506840 #
silisili ◴[] No.44506840[source]
In terms of years, not that old.

In terms of process, it's ancient.

replies(2): >>44506987 #>>44507818 #
1. MangoToupe ◴[] No.44507818[source]
Eh if humanity had to revert to 12nm nothing would noticeably get worse
replies(1): >>44508067 #
2. kragen ◴[] No.44508067[source]
Cellphones would, servers would, not much else.
replies(1): >>44508451 #
3. MangoToupe ◴[] No.44508451[source]
I, personally, am not doing much with my phone i wasn't doing 10 years ago, which about lines up with a 16nm process. I think the camera is the only thing I'd really notice.
replies(1): >>44510595 #
4. kragen ◴[] No.44510595{3}[source]
Well, and all the internet services you use via the phone going away. Not sure about 5G.
replies(1): >>44511944 #
5. MangoToupe ◴[] No.44511944{4}[source]
I don't really use much aside from apple music, which was buggy but was released almost exactly 10 years ago, and apple photos, which was already a thing. Google was already circling the drain, so I suppose that's a good point.

5G wasn't really that necessary, although I know it's critical as a broadband replacement for many people.

I would miss TikTok, of course.