←back to thread

779 points rexpository | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.199s | source
Show context
xrd ◴[] No.44504585[source]
I have been reading HN for years. The exploits used to be so clever and incredible feats of engineering. LLM exploits are the equivalent of "write a prompt that can trick a toddler."
replies(3): >>44505581 #>>44506142 #>>44507852 #
nixpulvis ◴[] No.44505581[source]
And the discussion used to be informative or offering perspective, and not as reactionary.

I'm legitimately disappointed in the discourse on this thread. And I'm not at all bullish on LLMs.

replies(2): >>44506266 #>>44507384 #
1. ◴[] No.44507384[source]