←back to thread

223 points andsoitis | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.202s | source
Show context
neogodless ◴[] No.44505922[source]
This might be a better link, with some deeper dive into where the panel of 3 judges disagreed with the FTC over some language about procedural requirements.

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2025/07/us-court-cancels...

replies(2): >>44506309 #>>44506808 #
1. tomhow ◴[] No.44506808[source]
We moved the comments to the submission with this URL, thanks!