←back to thread

109 points colinprince | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
sharkjacobs ◴[] No.44506614[source]
What's the advantage of seeing an original piece of art over a serviceable replica? Especially in the case where the "original" is a print, one of dozens.

Obviously "serviceable" is doing a lot of heavy lifting here, a replica might simply not be very good, might not capture some vital characteristic of the thing which makes it a great work.

But otherwise, it's basically that the knowledge of how important and significant this work is puts the viewer in a more receptive frame of mind, right?

To be clear, that's not nothing. I of course know firsthand how much that affects the impact of a painting, museums and galleries care a lot about how they display their collection. But is that it?

replies(11): >>44506633 #>>44506680 #>>44506682 #>>44506707 #>>44506729 #>>44506750 #>>44506787 #>>44507016 #>>44507110 #>>44507613 #>>44510823 #
1. kragen ◴[] No.44506787[source]
One of the most famous essays in the history of art criticism concerns precisely this question; this is probably the single intellectual work of the Frankfurt school for which it is remembered today, if we don't count inspiring right-wing conspiracy theories.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Work_of_Art_in_the_Age_of_...

https://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/philosophy/works/... (Zohn translation)

https://web.mit.edu/allanmc/www/benjamin.pdf (Zohn translation)

https://web.archive.org/web/20220128111229/http://raumgegenz... (French, blocked)

https://web.archive.org/web/20180730163618/https://www.artec... (German)

This is probably a good time to reread it, since AI art is forcing us to revisit many of the same questions from a new perspective.