This might be a better link, with some deeper dive into where the panel of 3 judges disagreed with the FTC over some language about procedural requirements.
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2025/07/us-court-cancels...
replies(2):
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2025/07/us-court-cancels...
It's definitely a much better link.
It actually describes what the ftc did wrong and even links to the decision. The guardian link doesn't do either, and so doesn't actually provide for meaningful discussion.
I understand there is a "by the book" process that should be respected, but this seems very fishy to me. I am certain the regulation would have passed had the tables been turned (meaning the companies would benefit from that said regulation)