←back to thread

224 points mshockwave | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
alephnerd ◴[] No.44502181[source]
Interesting but complementary foray into owning the end-to-end pipeline of chip design, fabrication, and packaging - especially for embedded use cases.

MIPS has also hitched it's horse to RISC-V now, and I am seeing a critical mass of talent and capital forming in that space.

replies(2): >>44502288 #>>44503638 #
kragen ◴[] No.44502288[source]
The critical mass of talent and capital forming in the RISC-V space happened in 02019 at Alibaba: https://www.cnx-software.com/2019/07/27/alibaba-unveils-xuan...

AFAIK MIPS still hasn't shipped a high-end processor competitive with the XuanTie 910 that article is about. And I think the billions of RISC-V microcontroller cores that have shipped already (10 billion as of 02022 according to https://wccftech.com/x86-arm-rival-risc-v-architecture-ships...) are also mostly not from MIPS.

replies(4): >>44502616 #>>44502618 #>>44503499 #>>44504041 #
garblegarble ◴[] No.44502616[source]
off-topic but: I've noticed you prefix years with a zero in your HN comments. First I thought it was just a typo, but I see you've made several comments like that. Is there some significance, or are you just raising awareness of the year 9999 problem?
replies(3): >>44503103 #>>44503441 #>>44505071 #
rrakow ◴[] No.44503103[source]
I think that's some "Long Now Foundation" meme.
replies(1): >>44503363 #
dcminter ◴[] No.44503363[source]
That. Personally I think it's performative nonsense, but you have to admire the commitment to it.
replies(3): >>44503566 #>>44503788 #>>44504330 #
kstrauser ◴[] No.44503566[source]
I suspect it’s counterproductive, though, like deliberately not using pronouns and always referring to someone by name. The intent might be to draw attention to the author’s cause, but it’s more likely to come across that the author just writes weirdly.
replies(1): >>44503605 #
dcminter ◴[] No.44503605{3}[source]
Eh, I also think it's harmless, and lends a certain "brand" to their posts - which are usually quite good otherwise. Better to be weird than dull, right?
replies(2): >>44503893 #>>44504986 #
1. andrekandre ◴[] No.44504986{4}[source]
idk, i personally was confused by it; i thought they were referencing some node number or referencing some other thing and got hung up on it....