←back to thread

224 points mshockwave | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.203s | source
Show context
alephnerd ◴[] No.44502181[source]
Interesting but complementary foray into owning the end-to-end pipeline of chip design, fabrication, and packaging - especially for embedded use cases.

MIPS has also hitched it's horse to RISC-V now, and I am seeing a critical mass of talent and capital forming in that space.

replies(2): >>44502288 #>>44503638 #
kragen ◴[] No.44502288[source]
The critical mass of talent and capital forming in the RISC-V space happened in 02019 at Alibaba: https://www.cnx-software.com/2019/07/27/alibaba-unveils-xuan...

AFAIK MIPS still hasn't shipped a high-end processor competitive with the XuanTie 910 that article is about. And I think the billions of RISC-V microcontroller cores that have shipped already (10 billion as of 02022 according to https://wccftech.com/x86-arm-rival-risc-v-architecture-ships...) are also mostly not from MIPS.

replies(4): >>44502616 #>>44502618 #>>44503499 #>>44504041 #
garblegarble ◴[] No.44502616[source]
off-topic but: I've noticed you prefix years with a zero in your HN comments. First I thought it was just a typo, but I see you've made several comments like that. Is there some significance, or are you just raising awareness of the year 9999 problem?
replies(3): >>44503103 #>>44503441 #>>44505071 #
rrakow ◴[] No.44503103[source]
I think that's some "Long Now Foundation" meme.
replies(1): >>44503363 #
dcminter ◴[] No.44503363[source]
That. Personally I think it's performative nonsense, but you have to admire the commitment to it.
replies(3): >>44503566 #>>44503788 #>>44504330 #
kstrauser ◴[] No.44503566[source]
I suspect it’s counterproductive, though, like deliberately not using pronouns and always referring to someone by name. The intent might be to draw attention to the author’s cause, but it’s more likely to come across that the author just writes weirdly.
replies(1): >>44503605 #
dcminter ◴[] No.44503605[source]
Eh, I also think it's harmless, and lends a certain "brand" to their posts - which are usually quite good otherwise. Better to be weird than dull, right?
replies(2): >>44503893 #>>44504986 #
kstrauser ◴[] No.44503893[source]
I guess, unless the offputting:goodness ratio gets lopsided and makes people start ignoring them.

Frankly, something about that leading 0 makes me grit my teeth and stop reading. I can't explain why it affects me like that. Perhaps I'm the only one who does, although threads like this seem to pop up whenever they post so I don't think so. If HN had a mute button, I'd probably use it just because it annoys me to that level.

Edit: And now that we're talking about it, they seem to have the need to mention a specific year way more than most, as though deliberately looking for opportunities to draw attention to themselves. Oof. That just made it about 10x more grating to me.

replies(2): >>44503976 #>>44504268 #
dcminter ◴[] No.44503976[source]
I do get where you're coming from; for me I think it interrupts the way I scan text - a date would be unconsciously absorbed but these stand out as abnormal artefacts requiring full attention.
replies(1): >>44504397 #
1. kstrauser ◴[] No.44504397[source]
Yeah, that's a great way of explaining it. Every time, it raises an exception in my mental parser and I have to go back and consciously evaluate it. Then I see that it's the same person who got me yet again, and I grit my teeth.