←back to thread

Brut: A New Web Framework for Ruby

(naildrivin5.com)

194 points onnnon | 4 comments | 08 Jul 25 18:03 UTC | HN request time: 0.69s | source

Show context

andrewstuart[dead post] ◴[08 Jul 25 21:13 UTC] No.44504131[source]▶

>>44502463 (OP) #

[flagged]

1. davetron5000 ◴[08 Jul 25 21:23 UTC] No.44504182[source]▶

I like Ruby! Ruby has types. They just aren't enforced by a compiler.

replies(1): >>44504219 #

2. gavmor ◴[08 Jul 25 21:29 UTC] No.44504219[source]▶

>>44504182 (TP) #

Well, yeah, then what's the point?

replies(2): >>44504291 #>>44508050 #

3. davetron5000 ◴[08 Jul 25 21:39 UTC] No.44504291[source]▶

I'm OK not using a compiler. Used one for years and am good on that for now. I like writing Ruby.

4. Lio ◴[09 Jul 25 09:56 UTC] No.44508050[source]▶

You can use a static analysis tool to check Ruby types ahead of time (still not a compiler) or provide information for tooling.

Alternatively you use them at runtime to check the correctness of data, which I don't think you can usually do with say Typescript where the typing information is for the most part compiled away[1].

1. I may be out of date on this but when I last looked at runtimes that could take Typescript directly they just threw the typing away. You just didn't need to use the tsc compiler first.