←back to thread

224 points mshockwave | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.766s | source
Show context
alephnerd ◴[] No.44502181[source]
Interesting but complementary foray into owning the end-to-end pipeline of chip design, fabrication, and packaging - especially for embedded use cases.

MIPS has also hitched it's horse to RISC-V now, and I am seeing a critical mass of talent and capital forming in that space.

replies(2): >>44502288 #>>44503638 #
kragen ◴[] No.44502288[source]
The critical mass of talent and capital forming in the RISC-V space happened in 02019 at Alibaba: https://www.cnx-software.com/2019/07/27/alibaba-unveils-xuan...

AFAIK MIPS still hasn't shipped a high-end processor competitive with the XuanTie 910 that article is about. And I think the billions of RISC-V microcontroller cores that have shipped already (10 billion as of 02022 according to https://wccftech.com/x86-arm-rival-risc-v-architecture-ships...) are also mostly not from MIPS.

replies(4): >>44502616 #>>44502618 #>>44503499 #>>44504041 #
nine_k ◴[] No.44502618[source]
(BTW why do you write years with a leafing zero? Do you expect these post to still matter past year 9999?)
replies(1): >>44503384 #
dcminter ◴[] No.44503384[source]
...and if he does, why does he then consider the year 99999 to be out of reach? As I understand it the idea is to promote "long term thinking" but I really don't see how this affectation is actually supposed to achieve anything beyond mildly irritating/confusing the reader.

At least the Long Now Foundation stuff comes with that context built-in.

https://longnow.org/

replies(1): >>44503512 #
1. ndiddy ◴[] No.44503512[source]
Good point, I will start the Longer Now foundation and start adding two zeroes to the front of all my years.
replies(1): >>44508367 #
2. hypercube33 ◴[] No.44508367[source]
This whole line of conversation and use of the leading zero reminds me of The Church of MOO from the old internet.
replies(1): >>44508595 #
3. dcminter ◴[] No.44508595[source]
Huh, I know about Bob Dobson et al, but MOO-ism somehow escaped my notice back in the day.

http://textfiles.com/occult/MOOISM/

I have some retro-reading to do.