←back to thread

347 points avadhesh18 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.204s | source

Hi HN!

I'm the developer of rdx, a mildly popular ad-free, privacy and user friendly Reddit client. This time, I made something for a very specific use case: solving chess puzzles with no internet.

Why? Well, my Wi-Fi is terrible in the bathroom—and that's where I do some of my best thinking. I tried printing out “mate in X” puzzles to solve offline, but they weren’t fun without interaction. So I built OffChess.

OffChess is an iPhone/Android app that contains over 100,000 chess puzzles, fully offline and completely ad-free. You can solve puzzles by category (Mate in 1/2/3/4/5, tactics like pins/forks/skewers, or openings like Sicilian/French, etc). You gain or lose points based on how you perform, so there's a light rating system to keep things engaging.

No accounts, no tracking, no monthly subscriptions, no internet required. Just pure, old-school tactical chess training, wherever you are.

You can check out the iPhone/iPad app at https://apps.apple.com/us/app/chess-puzzles-offchess/id67447... or the Android app at https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.offchess

Would love feedback, bug reports, or suggestions.

Thanks!

Show context
tomhow ◴[] No.44499848[source]
[stub for offtopicness]
replies(7): >>44499111 #>>44499179 #>>44499233 #>>44499340 #>>44500190 #>>44500800 #>>44504468 #
lucb1e ◴[] No.44500800[source]
Note that the discussion continues in the collapsed comment by tomhow: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44499848

It says "stub for offtopicness" but, skimming them, literally all comments are on-topic. Not all substantial ('very nice app', 'whats the tech stack?') but a lot of other comments are a normal amount of substantial and also in there... I don't get it, but note that you can expand that subthread

replies(2): >>44501359 #>>44504071 #
krishnasangeeth ◴[] No.44501359[source]
I posted this

``` Hi ,Congrats on the launch. I built a free iOS app also which has chess puzzles.

https://apps.apple.com/us/app/knighty-chess-puzzles/id674524...

Would appreciate feedback. ```

Not sure if that's why it was moved to `stub for off topicness`. I wonder if it is some kind of categorisation logic based on text.

replies(2): >>44502345 #>>44502633 #
lucb1e ◴[] No.44502345[source]
I'm also wondering if it's an automatic classification. Wouldn't expect that on HN, but the posts in there are so random that it almost must be.

As for that specific comment, to be fair, I could actually understand: promoting your own product in someone else's thread without really saying anything at all about the submission (topic) that was posted could be seen as off-topic. I don't really mind it (I don't think I voted on it), but I could see a human also classify it that way

replies(1): >>44502838 #
1. krishnasangeeth ◴[] No.44502838[source]
Yeah , that's fair. More than promotion i was trying to suggest i had also built something similar and kind of understand the product space. It's this dev thing, can't shake it off i guess. But i get what you meant.

Apart from that i have a theory that there is a lot of ML based ranking and classification that is happening at the backend.