←back to thread

1246 points adrianh | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.215s | source
Show context
gortok ◴[] No.44495659[source]
I think folks have taken the wrong lesson from this.

It’s not that they added a new feature because there was demand.

They added a new feature because technology hallucinated a feature that didn’t exist.

The savior of tech, generative AI, was telling folks a feature existed that didn’t exist.

That’s what the headline is, and in a sane world the folks that run ChatGPT would be falling over themselves to be sure it didn’t happen again, because next time it might not be so benign as it was this time.

replies(7): >>44495919 #>>44496083 #>>44496091 #>>44497641 #>>44498195 #>>44500852 #>>44505736 #
lexandstuff ◴[] No.44495919[source]
Sometimes you just have to deal with the world as it is, not how you think it should be.
replies(1): >>44496062 #
gortok ◴[] No.44496062[source]
Is it your argument that the folks that make generative AI applications have nothing to improve from this example?
replies(1): >>44502343 #
1. rustyminnow ◴[] No.44502343[source]
If I were someone who ran ChatGPT then yeah, I'd have something to improve. But most of us aren't, and can't do anything about it - so might as well make lemons into lemonade instead of getting hung up on the obvious and unchangeable fact that our future is filled with AI garbage.