←back to thread

128 points ArmageddonIt | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0.818s | source
1. nailer ◴[] No.44500851[source]
From the article:

_____

The first cars were:

- Loud and unreliable

- Expensive and hard to repair

- Starved for fuel in a world with no gas stations

- Unsuitable for the dirt roads of rural America

_____

Reminds me of Linux in the late 90s. Talking to Solaris, HPUX or NT4 advocates, many were sure Linux was not going to succeed because:

- It didn't support multiple processors

- There was nobody to pay for commercial support

- It didn't support the POSIX standard

replies(2): >>44500926 #>>44501629 #
2. WillAdams ◴[] No.44500926[source]
>- Starved for fuel in a world with no gas stations

Actually, gasoline was readily available in its rôle as fuel for farm and other equipment, and as a bottled cleaning product sold at drug stores and the like.

>- Unsuitable for the dirt roads of rural America

but the process of improving roads for the new-fangled bicycle was well underway.

3. bpt3 ◴[] No.44501629[source]
Linux won on cost once it was "good enough". AI isn't free (by any definition of free) and is a long way away from "good enough" to be a general replacement for the status quo in a lot of domains.

The areas where it does make sense to use, it's been in use for years, if not longer, without anyone screaming from the rooftops about it.

replies(1): >>44509054 #
4. nailer ◴[] No.44509054[source]
By the time Linux won it was better - by 2003 you could take a workload that took eight hours on some ridiculous Sun machine and run it in 40 minutes on a Xeon box.