←back to thread

523 points mhga | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.207s | source
Show context
rich_sasha ◴[] No.44497577[source]
Offending or over-accusing sides of this conflict is a very asymmetric risk. Misrepresent Palestinians negatively and you may eventually get an angry, vague letter - with a quarter of signatories doing so anonymously. Misrepresent Israelis negatively and you get very powerful and well-organised protests. BBC is sadly doing the rational thing of staying clear of suggesting Israel may be doing some bad things. It is a Corporation after all and so acts in corporate ways.

But this is also the example coming to them from the top. On the occasions where Israel has clearly committed egregious violations, such as shooting at people massed at the aid dispensal locations or the medics who then got buried in shallow graves, Israel gets barely a whimper of criticism from European politicians - and apparently full-throated cheering and support from the US. The ICC arrest warrant is as forgotten as last year's snow.

So why are we surprised the BBC doesn't want to stick its head above the parapet?

replies(9): >>44497864 #>>44497881 #>>44497983 #>>44498194 #>>44498240 #>>44498415 #>>44499944 #>>44500139 #>>44503427 #
raxxorraxor ◴[] No.44498415[source]
There was a study about negative bias towards Israel at the BBC. It contradicts your explanation.

Do you have a single example of a protest you try to summon here? I very much doubt it.

replies(4): >>44498648 #>>44498814 #>>44499156 #>>44516714 #
1. alkyon ◴[] No.44498648[source]
Do you mean a report by the Israeli-based lawyer Trevor Asserson, maybe?

https://campaignformediastandards.org.uk/asserson-report.pdf

If so, then you're spreading misinformation. This is not a study. It's a report sponsored by Israel. It has flawed methodology and they made heavy use of ChatGPT.

I rest my case.