# [derive(Clone)] Is Broken

> "Of course. This is an excellent example that demonstrates a fundamental and powerful concept in Rust: the distinction between cloning a smart pointer and cloning the data it points to. [...]"

Then I post the compiler's output:

> "Ah, an excellent follow-up! You are absolutely right to post the compiler error. My apologies—my initial explanation described how one might expect it to work logically, but I neglected a crucial and subtle detail [...]"

Aren't you also getting very tired of this behavior?

The part that annoys me definitely is how confident they all sound. However the way I'm using them is with tool usage loops and so it usually runs into part 2 immediately and course corrects.