←back to thread

Open letter accuses BBC board member of having a conflict of interest on Gaza

(www.theguardian.com)
523 points mhga | 3 comments | 08 Jul 25 02:18 UTC | HN request time: 0.759s | source
Show context
hliyan ◴[08 Jul 25 03:07 UTC] No.44496589[source]▶
I'm starting to realize, very belatedly in life, that we suffer from an end-of-history illusion in politics and political economy. I used to think we live in a golden age because a hundred years ago, democracy broadly replaced monarchies, market economies replaced feudalism and other coercive systems, and with it went many of the old, indirect mechanisms of subjugating large populations (e.g. moral imperatives through the Church, legitimization of rule through concepts such as the divine right of kings, control of education etc).

But it seems we've only replaced those mechanisms with more refined versions (manufacturing consent through mass media, surveillance and indirect indentured servitude through student debt, rent and health insurance).

We probably have another century of socioeconomic and political evolution to go before we reach a decent end state.

replies(14): >>44496602 #>>44496623 #>>44496657 #>>44496662 #>>44496711 #>>44496815 #>>44496891 #>>44496901 #>>44496953 #>>44496961 #>>44496987 #>>44496997 #>>44497210 #>>44497837 #
cantor_S_drug ◴[08 Jul 25 03:19 UTC] No.44496662[source]▶
The problem is you can't even point a finger or single out people responsible for the current state of things. Unless we collectively accept there is a problem, the solution will not get implemented.
replies(3): >>44496874 #>>44496895 #>>44497395 #
somename9 ◴[08 Jul 25 05:38 UTC] No.44497395[source]▶
This is why monarchies are better than democracies. There is no accountability or ownership. A king wants to pass down something better to his progeny. A politician wants to make money and generally doesn’t care what state he leaves things in.
replies(2): >>44497867 #>>44504487 #
1. parineum ◴[08 Jul 25 07:27 UTC] No.44497867[source]▶
Why don't politicians care about their kids and why do monarchs not care about money?
replies(1): >>44498348 #
2. somename9 ◴[08 Jul 25 09:09 UTC] No.44498348[source]▶
I never said either of those things. By progeny, I meant both the heirs of the king and the common race of people belonging to the kingdom. Kings were the head of different races of people and as the head, they looked after their people (if they were a good king). For example, a good king wouldn’t import millions of people who are different from those in his kingdom for economic reasons, and you don’t see this in history. It is his job to take care of his people and if he suddenly gave them an incredible amount of competition for resources, he would be responsible for causing his people great difficulty. He cares about them and wouldn’t do that.

Politicians don’t have this headship and from their behavior clearly don’t view themselves as stewards of their country and people (they do care about their own children though). An example of this would be Mike Lee’s attempt to sell off American public lands to foreign interests. The money raised from this would not make a dent in the deficit or debt, and it would take away beautiful fishing and hiking from Americans. Thankfully this was done away with, but a good king would never consider selling public land in the middle of his country to foreigners.

replies(1): >>44500410 #
3. parineum ◴[08 Jul 25 14:38 UTC] No.44500410[source]▶
> a good king...

Now compare a good king to a good politician.