←back to thread

418 points pyman | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.201s | source
Show context
bgwalter ◴[] No.44490836[source]
Here is how individuals are treated for massive copyright infringement:

https://investors.autodesk.com/news-releases/news-release-de...

replies(8): >>44490942 #>>44491257 #>>44491526 #>>44491536 #>>44491907 #>>44493281 #>>44493918 #>>44493925 #
JimDabell ◴[] No.44491536[source]
> illegally copying and selling pirated software

This is very different to what Anthropic did. Nobody was buying copies of books from Anthropic instead of the copyright holder.

replies(2): >>44492266 #>>44492825 #
armada651 ◴[] No.44492825[source]
I wouldn't be so sure about that statement, no one has ruled on the output of Anthropic's AI yet. If their AI spits out the original copy of the book then it is practically the same as buying a book from them instead of the copyright holder.

We've only dealt with the fairly straight-forward legal questions so far. This legal battle is still far from being settled.

replies(3): >>44493071 #>>44493863 #>>44496751 #
1. JimDabell ◴[] No.44496751[source]
> If their AI spits out the original copy of the book

Not even the authors suing Anthropic have claimed it can do this, have they?