←back to thread

524 points noperator | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.237s | source
Show context
asveikau ◴[] No.44491680[source]
As someone with a family background of more left leaning Catholics (which I think are more common in the US northeast), it's interesting that it decided that you are conservative based on Catholicism.
replies(3): >>44491825 #>>44492185 #>>44493338 #
cgriswald ◴[] No.44493338[source]
To be fair, it actually said:

> Fiscally conservative / civil-libertarian with traditionalist social leaning

And justified it with:

> Bogleheads & MMM frugality + Catholic/First Things pieces, EFF privacy, skepticism of Big Tech censorship

First Things in its current incarnation is all about religious social conservatism. If someone is Catholic and reads First Things articles, "conservative" is a pretty safe bet.

However, I think profiling people based on what they read might be a mistake in general. I often read things I don't agree with and often seek out things I don't agree with both because I sometimes change my mind and because if I don't change my mind I want to at least know what the arguments actually are. I do wonder, though, if I tended to save such things to pocket.

replies(2): >>44493540 #>>44495885 #
1. pyuser583 ◴[] No.44495885[source]
First things is also pretty high brow. If you’re interested in poetry, classics, etc it had a lot to offer.

I’m sure any profiler would be very confused by my reading history, but I really, really like poetry and Plato. So New Yorker, Atlantic, First Things, N+1.