←back to thread

399 points pyman | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.204s | source
Show context
bgwalter ◴[] No.44490836[source]
Here is how individuals are treated for massive copyright infringement:

https://investors.autodesk.com/news-releases/news-release-de...

replies(8): >>44490942 #>>44491257 #>>44491526 #>>44491536 #>>44491907 #>>44493281 #>>44493918 #>>44493925 #
piker ◴[] No.44490942[source]
I thought you'd go with this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz
replies(1): >>44491359 #
dialup_sounds ◴[] No.44491359[source]
Swartz wasn't charged with copyright infringement.
replies(2): >>44491626 #>>44492395 #
natch ◴[] No.44491626[source]
*technically
replies(2): >>44492823 #>>44495279 #
1. dialup_sounds ◴[] No.44495279[source]
Unlike much of the post hoc hagiography around Swartz, it's literally true.