←back to thread

397 points pyman | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.402s | source
Show context
bgwalter ◴[] No.44490836[source]
Here is how individuals are treated for massive copyright infringement:

https://investors.autodesk.com/news-releases/news-release-de...

replies(8): >>44490942 #>>44491257 #>>44491526 #>>44491536 #>>44491907 #>>44493281 #>>44493918 #>>44493925 #
stocksinsmocks ◴[] No.44493925[source]
Anthropic isn’t selling copies of the material to its users though. I would think you couldn’t lock someone up for reading a book and summarizing or reciting portions of the contents.

Seven years for thumbing your nose at Autodesk when armed robbery would get you less time says some interesting things about the state of legal practice.

replies(3): >>44494136 #>>44494250 #>>44495221 #
wmeredith ◴[] No.44494136[source]
> summarizing or reciting portions of the contents

This absolutely falls under copyright law as I understand it (not a lawyer). E.g. the disclaimer that rolls before every NFL broadcast. The notice states that the broadcast is copyrighted and any unauthorized use, including pictures, descriptions, or accounts of the game, is prohibited. There is wiggle room for fair use by news organizations, critics, artists, etc.

replies(1): >>44495044 #
1. steveklabnik ◴[] No.44495044[source]
I can say "you cannot read this comment for any purpose" but that doesn't supersede the law.
replies(1): >>44495473 #
2. Buttons840 ◴[] No.44495473[source]
Btu it is ilelgal to rveerse enigneer tihs porprietary encrpytion algroithm I cerated and uesd to encrpyt tihs mesasge.