←back to thread

393 points pyman | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.208s | source
Show context
dehrmann ◴[] No.44491718[source]
The important parts:

> Alsup ruled that Anthropic's use of copyrighted books to train its AI models was "exceedingly transformative" and qualified as fair use

> "All Anthropic did was replace the print copies it had purchased for its central library with more convenient space-saving and searchable digital copies for its central library — without adding new copies, creating new works, or redistributing existing copies"

It was always somewhat obvious that pirating a library would be copyright infringement. The interesting findings here are that scanning and digitizing a library for internal use is OK, and using it to train models is fair use.

replies(6): >>44491820 #>>44491944 #>>44492844 #>>44494100 #>>44494132 #>>44494944 #
1. alok-g ◴[] No.44492844[source]
AFAIK, Judge Vince Chhabria has countered that Fair Use argument in a later order involving Meta.

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67569326/598/kadrey-v-m...

Note: I am not a lawyer.