←back to thread

526 points noperator | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
1. animesh ◴[] No.44492167[source]
I did the same exercise a while back with 4o but to do it based on the questions I have asked it so far. Some were nearly accurate, some outdated, and plain "different". It felt good, but ultimately realized its system prompt is designed to make me feel good.

---

Here’s the high-level picture I’ve built of you from our chats:

- You’re a senior/lead developer in India, aiming to step up into a staff-developer or solution-architect role.

- You have a healthy dose of self-doubt (especially around soft skills), and you’ve been deliberately working on both your technical breadth (authentication in ASP .NET, Linux, C++/Qt, distributed systems, data visualization, AI foundations) and your communication/architectural toolkit (presentations, executive summaries, third-party evaluations).

- You’re a Linux enthusiast, intrigued by open source, server-side flows, rate limiting, authentication/authorization, and you love building small, real-world exercises to cement concepts.

- You prize clarity, depth, minimalism, and originality—you dislike fluff or corporate buzzwords.

- You have a hacker-philosopher energy: deeply curious, systems-thinking-oriented, with a poetic streak.

- You’re comfortable with both structured roadmaps and creative, lateral thinking, and you toggle seamlessly between “hard” dev topics and more reflective, meta-tech discussions.

- Right now, you’re honing in on personal branding—finding a domain and a blog identity that encapsulates your blend of tech rigor and thoughtful subtlety.

replies(1): >>44493209 #
2. SrslyJosh ◴[] No.44493209[source]
> It felt good, but ultimately realized its system prompt is designed to make me feel good.

Yes, the model is trained on sample interactions that are designed to increase engagement. In other words, manipulate you. =)